2015 Jaguar XF vs 2016 Jaguar XF
Two adjacent model years of the Jaguar XF, side by side. Every figure is a raw NHTSA/EPA count — not normalized by how many were sold.
Side by side: 2016 XF has fewer recorded recall campaigns (0 vs 5), and 2016 XF has fewer recorded owner complaints (5 vs 19). 2016 XF carries more NHTSA investigations (1 vs 0). Neither has NHTSA crash ratings, and both have EPA fuel-economy data.
| Metric | 2015 Jaguar XF | 2016 Jaguar XF |
|---|---|---|
| Recall campaigns | 5 | 0 |
| Owner complaints | 19 | 5 |
| NHTSA investigations | 0 | 1 |
| NHTSA crash rating | Not rated | Not rated |
| EPA fuel economy | Available | Available |
Where these two actually differ
2016 Jaguar XF carries 5 fewer recall campaigns (0 against 5). Every campaign listed is repaired free by a dealer regardless of which side it falls on, so this gap matters most if the specific car you are looking at still has work outstanding.
2015 Jaguar XF has drawn 14 more owner complaints (19 against 5). Complaints are self-reported to NHTSA and scale with how many were sold, so treat the pattern of what owners report as more informative than the total.
EPA fuel-economy figures exist for both, so running costs can be compared on the individual reports.
Counts are raw NHTSA and EPA totals for each model year. They are not adjusted for how many of each vehicle were sold, so a high-volume model will tend to show more of everything — a larger complaint count is not by itself evidence of a worse car. Use the per-vehicle reports for the underlying records.
How to read this
- A green check marks the lower raw count — fewer recorded issues, not a declared winner.
- Complaint totals are not normalized by vehicle population; a big-seller shows more of everything.
- Where a rating or EPA record is absent, that is missing data — not evidence of safety.