Skip to content

Free public service · Official NHTSA & EPA data

2016 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2017 Chrysler Pacifica

Two adjacent model years of the Chrysler Pacifica, side by side. Every figure is a raw NHTSA/EPA count — not normalized by how many were sold.

Side by side: 2016 Pacifica has fewer recorded recall campaigns (0 vs 11), and 2016 Pacifica has fewer recorded owner complaints (2 vs 1483). 2017 Pacifica carries more NHTSA investigations (3 vs 0). Only 2017 Pacifica has NHTSA crash ratings, and 2017 Pacifica has EPA fuel-economy data.

Metric2016 Chrysler Pacifica2017 Chrysler Pacifica
Recall campaigns011
Owner complaints21,483
NHTSA investigations03
NHTSA crash ratingNot ratedRated by NHTSA
EPA fuel economyAvailable

Where these two actually differ

2016 Chrysler Pacifica carries 11 fewer recall campaigns (0 against 11). Every campaign listed is repaired free by a dealer regardless of which side it falls on, so this gap matters most if the specific car you are looking at still has work outstanding.

2017 Chrysler Pacifica has drawn 1,481 more owner complaints (1,483 against 2). Complaints are self-reported to NHTSA and scale with how many were sold, so treat the pattern of what owners report as more informative than the total.

Only 2017 Chrysler Pacifica has been crash-tested by NHTSA. The other has no published NCAP result, which is an absence of data rather than a poor one, and means the two cannot be compared on crash performance at all.

Counts are raw NHTSA and EPA totals for each model year. They are not adjusted for how many of each vehicle were sold, so a high-volume model will tend to show more of everything — a larger complaint count is not by itself evidence of a worse car. Use the per-vehicle reports for the underlying records.

How to read this

  • A green check marks the lower raw count — fewer recorded issues, not a declared winner.
  • Complaint totals are not normalized by vehicle population; a big-seller shows more of everything.
  • Where a rating or EPA record is absent, that is missing data — not evidence of safety.