2016 Ford Expedition vs 2017 Ford Expedition
Two adjacent model years of the Ford Expedition, side by side. Every figure is a raw NHTSA/EPA count — not normalized by how many were sold.
Side by side: 2016 Expedition has fewer recorded recall campaigns (3 vs 4), and 2016 Expedition has fewer recorded owner complaints (212 vs 353). Both carry NHTSA crash ratings, and neither has EPA fuel-economy data in our dataset.
| Metric | 2016 Ford Expedition | 2017 Ford Expedition |
|---|---|---|
| Recall campaigns | 3 | 4 |
| Owner complaints | 212 | 353 |
| NHTSA investigations | 0 | 0 |
| NHTSA crash rating | Rated by NHTSA | Rated by NHTSA |
| EPA fuel economy | — | — |
Where these two actually differ
2016 Ford Expedition carries 1 fewer recall campaign (3 against 4). Every campaign listed is repaired free by a dealer regardless of which side it falls on, so this gap matters most if the specific car you are looking at still has work outstanding.
2017 Ford Expedition has drawn 141 more owner complaints (353 against 212). Complaints are self-reported to NHTSA and scale with how many were sold, so treat the pattern of what owners report as more informative than the total.
Both have been crash-tested by NHTSA, so their star ratings are directly comparable — they were assessed under the same program in the same year.
Counts are raw NHTSA and EPA totals for each model year. They are not adjusted for how many of each vehicle were sold, so a high-volume model will tend to show more of everything — a larger complaint count is not by itself evidence of a worse car. Use the per-vehicle reports for the underlying records.
How to read this
- A green check marks the lower raw count — fewer recorded issues, not a declared winner.
- Complaint totals are not normalized by vehicle population; a big-seller shows more of everything.
- Where a rating or EPA record is absent, that is missing data — not evidence of safety.