2018 Chrysler Pacifica vs 2019 Chrysler Pacifica
Two adjacent model years of the Chrysler Pacifica, side by side. Every figure is a raw NHTSA/EPA count — not normalized by how many were sold.
Side by side: 2019 Pacifica has fewer recorded recall campaigns (7 vs 12), and 2019 Pacifica has fewer recorded owner complaints (337 vs 823). 2018 Pacifica carries more NHTSA investigations (4 vs 2). Both carry NHTSA crash ratings, and both have EPA fuel-economy data.
| Metric | 2018 Chrysler Pacifica | 2019 Chrysler Pacifica |
|---|---|---|
| Recall campaigns | 12 | 7 |
| Owner complaints | 823 | 337 |
| NHTSA investigations | 4 | 2 |
| NHTSA crash rating | Rated by NHTSA | Rated by NHTSA |
| EPA fuel economy | Available | Available |
Where these two actually differ
2019 Chrysler Pacifica carries 5 fewer recall campaigns (7 against 12). Every campaign listed is repaired free by a dealer regardless of which side it falls on, so this gap matters most if the specific car you are looking at still has work outstanding.
2018 Chrysler Pacifica has drawn 486 more owner complaints (823 against 337). Complaints are self-reported to NHTSA and scale with how many were sold, so treat the pattern of what owners report as more informative than the total.
Both have been crash-tested by NHTSA, so their star ratings are directly comparable — they were assessed under the same program in the same year.
EPA fuel-economy figures exist for both, so running costs can be compared on the individual reports.
Counts are raw NHTSA and EPA totals for each model year. They are not adjusted for how many of each vehicle were sold, so a high-volume model will tend to show more of everything — a larger complaint count is not by itself evidence of a worse car. Use the per-vehicle reports for the underlying records.
How to read this
- A green check marks the lower raw count — fewer recorded issues, not a declared winner.
- Complaint totals are not normalized by vehicle population; a big-seller shows more of everything.
- Where a rating or EPA record is absent, that is missing data — not evidence of safety.