2024 Cadillac Lyriq Complaints

SERVICE BRAKES,FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE — Filed 07/09/2026

In the past 18 months the vehicle has experienced phantom breaking while driving 3 times. Each time there were no vehicles within 30 or more feet from the vehicle. All 3 times occurred while driving the vehicle and going between 20-40 mph. The vehicle engaged in an emergency break and stopped the car in the road. All three times could have resulted in a major accident as it occurred on busy roadways. This last time it happened in the middle of an intersection with no vehicles around me or behind me. This is a major safety concern and put my family and I in a potentially dangerous situation that could have caused major injuries to myself, my family and others around us. The vehicle is currently with Cadillac being inspected. During conversations with Cadillac they said this is a known issue and suggested that I turn the mechanism off and bypass the safety feature to avoid it from happening again. This is not a systematic fix. This is a bypass. We purchased the car for the safety and security and how sophisticated the safety mechanisms are and we have now been told as a suggestion to simply bypass it. This is very concerning on a national level of That the vehicle is known for doing this. We no longer feel safe in this vehicle The dealer has not confirmed if they have gotten it to duplicate. The only updates we have is that they are still working on the diagnostic testing. There were no warnings prior to the phantom breaking taking place.

STEERING — Filed 06/25/2026

Component Involved: Steering Wheel Assembly (Super Cruise Steering Wheel Light Bar / Rim)Safety Defect Description:The plastic insert covering the Super Cruise LED light bar and the surrounding leather wrap located directly on the top rim of the steering wheel are breaking apart, peeling, and separating. This is an immediate and severe driving safety hazard. While executing turns and maneuvering the vehicle, the driver’s hands and clothing sleeves are actively getting caught and snagged on the exposed, broken plastic edges and peeling wrap on the wheel rim. This causes physical interference and sudden, unexpected entrapment of the driver's hand or clothing during active steering.Consequences of the Defect:This defect presents an imminent risk of a vehicle crash due to sudden mechanical restriction of the driver's hands. If a driver’s sleeve or fingers become trapped or snagged by the peeling steering wheel trim while negotiating a sharp turn, curve, or emergency evasive maneuver, they will be unable to smoothly rotate the wheel, leading to a direct loss of steering control.

BACK OVER PREVENTION,FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE — Filed 05/23/2026

I put the car in reverse and released the parking brake. The car started to move backwards. However, the back passenger door was wide open, and the passenger was standing outside the car in the path of the open door. The door hit a guide wire running from the top of a power pole to the sidewalk beside the car. The wire pulled the door backwards, destroying it. This was fortunate. Without the wire in the way, I would’ve had not heard the crashing of the door and would have continued to drive over the person standing beside the car as the passenger door knocked him down. The indicator that the door was still open is so small on the gauge cluster that I couldn’t see that the door was still open when I put the car into reverse. There was no audible warning that I was about to move before all doors were closed, and the emergency braking didn’t stop the car from moving. The passenger’s leg got pushed sideways under the open door. Had the guidewire not pulled the door backwards and caused so much noise that I stopped, the door would’ve broken the passenger’s leg and potentially pushed him under the rear passenger side tire.

SERVICE BRAKES — Filed 02/03/2025

What component or system failed or malfunctioned, and is it available for inspection upon request? The issue involves the Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) and the transition between regenerative braking and friction braking in my Cadillac Lyriq (RWD). The ABS engages unexpectedly during normal braking conditions when using one-pedal driving. The vehicle is available for inspection upon request. How was your safety or the safety of others put at risk? The unexpected ABS activation creates inconsistent and unpredictable braking behavior, including a pulsing sensation and reduced braking confidence. This affects the driver’s ability to modulate braking smoothly and predict stopping distance, increasing the risk of a collision, especially in normal traffic conditions where consistent braking response is critical. Has the problem been reproduced or confirmed by a dealer or independent service center? Yes. The issue has been reproduced during multiple visits to authorized Cadillac dealerships. However, I have been told that the vehicle is “operating as designed,” despite the abnormal braking behavior. Has the vehicle or component been inspected by the manufacturer, police, insurance representatives or others? The vehicle has been inspected by multiple authorized Cadillac dealerships and the issue has been escalated to General Motors. No resolution or fix has been provided to date. Were there any warning lamps, messages or other symptoms of the problem prior to the failure, and when did they first appear? There are no warning lights or messages associated with this issue. The problem occurs intermittently during normal driving conditions, particularly when transitioning from regenerative braking (one-pedal driving) to applying the brake pedal. The issue began shortly after taking delivery of the vehicle and has persisted since.

POWER TRAIN,ELECTRICAL SYSTEM,UNKNOWN OR OTHER — Filed 04/17/2026

My 2024 Cadillac LYRIQ generated the following High Voltage Battery fault codes via On-Demand Diagnostic: U2B4A, U2B4D, U2B50, U2B53, U2B56, U2B59, U2B5C, U2B5F, U2B62, U2B65, U2B68 — all under module VIC - Lithium-Ion Battery. Multiple codes are flagged "Service Right Away" indicating an active fault in the high voltage propulsion battery system. I brought the vehicle to Lindsay Cadillac, Alexandria VA [XXX] ) on [INSERT DROP-OFF DATE]. As of today [INSERT TODAY'S DATE], the vehicle has been sitting at the dealership for [X] days with ZERO repair action taken. The service manager has stated he does not know what to do, has no timeline, and cannot provide any answers. GM Technical Service Bulletins PIP6009B and 25-NA-044 specifically cover these exact DTCs and provide a documented repair procedure. The dealer has failed to follow or initiate this procedure. No loaner vehicle was provided despite this being a warranty repair on inoperative vehicle. I have been forced to rent a vehicle at $125/day out of pocket. I have an open Cadillac Concierge case number [93707662 #]. Cadillac Concierge was unable to reach the dealer's service department by phone. I have escalated in writing to GM's executive office including [XXX] and [XXX] with no resolution. This is a high voltage battery fault on an all-electric vehicle flagged as "Service Right Away" severity. The vehicle remains unrepaired, the dealer is unresponsive, and GM's own customer service cannot reach the dealer. This represents both a safety concern and a complete failure of the warranty service obligation. I am requesting NHTSA investigation of both the underlying battery defect and the dealer's failure to act on a known TSB. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM — Filed 03/12/2026

The vehicle has experienced repeated failures of the infotainment and display system, including the screen going blank and displaying “no content available” while functions such as Apple CarPlay are actively in use. The issue affects the ability to control media and view system information from both the main display and steering wheel controls. The vehicle has undergone multiple repair attempts, including replacement of the human machine interface (HMI) module and radio module, as well as repeated programming. Despite these repairs, the issue continues to reoccur, including immediately after the most recent repair. The condition is intermittent and difficult to duplicate, and a field service engineer has been unable to consistently reproduce the issue. The dealership has indicated there may not be a current fix and that resolution could depend on a future software update. This ongoing failure of critical display and control systems raises safety concerns and has not been resolved despite multiple repair attempts.

UNKNOWN OR OTHER — Filed 03/27/2026

Sunroof/moonroof cracked without any impact or signs of impact.

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM — Filed 08/12/2023

We own a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV. We began experiencing safety concerns related to battery performance and overall vehicle reliability during the active bumper-to-bumper warranty period. These concerns were reported to an authorized GM dealer, Napleton Cadillac, prior to warranty expiration. Service records at Napleton Cadillac document the history of these complaints. The vehicle has been unable to process required over-the-air (OTA) software updates through GM's intended automated update process. During a dealer visit on February 17, 2026, at GM's direction, the Napleton Cadillac service technician confirmed that the vehicle had multiple open notices and that our reported concerns are consistent with known issues affecting the 2024 Cadillac Lyriq across multiple units — indicating this is not an isolated occurrence. The dealer advised that correcting the update failure would require approximately five hours of manual labor at an estimated cost of $1,250 — a cost GM has declined to cover, despite the fact that the OTA update process is the manufacturer's intended method for delivering safety-critical corrections and the failure to update is a vehicle deficiency, not a customer-caused condition. Due to these unresolved safety concerns, we have not been driving the vehicle. We do not have confidence that the vehicle is operating safely or as designed. We formally requested a repurchase from General Motors through the EV Concierge program (Case No. 87486271). That request was denied on March 14, 2026, citing two rationales: (1) the vehicle is out of warranty, and (2) system updates do not qualify for repurchase. We believe these rationales fail to account for the fact that the original safety complaints were filed during the warranty period and that the root issue is battery and system safety — not a routine software preference. We are filing this complaint to create a formal federal safety record and to request that NHTSA evaluate an investigation or recall.

VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL,FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE — Filed 03/15/2026

COMPONENT: Vehicle Speed Control — Automatic Emergency Braking / Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) COMPLAINT: I am filing this complaint to report a POST-REMEDY FAILURE of the repair performed under NHTSA Safety Recall 24V589 (GM Program #N242453471) on my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq AWD. RECALL REMEDY COMPLETED: My vehicle received the Electronic Brake Control Module (EBCM) software update on August 13, 2024, under GM Program #N242453471. The recall was marked "Complete" by the servicing dealership on that date. FAILURE INCIDENT: On March 15, 2026, at low speed (under 25 mph) on a dry surface, my Lyriq failed to activate its Automatic Emergency Braking system while approaching a stationary object. The vehicle did not decelerate or stop as designed. The ABS system appeared to release braking pressure rather than maintain it, allowing the vehicle to continue forward and strike the object. The front grille assembly sustained significant physical damage as a direct result. This failure is identical in nature to the defect described in Recall 24V589 — specifically, the ABS falsely activating and releasing braking pressure during low-speed operation on a dry surface — despite the recall remedy having been applied and certified complete ten months prior. SAFETY CONCERN: The software remedy applied under Recall 24V589 did not correct the defect on my vehicle. This raises serious concerns about the effectiveness of the EBCM software update as a remedy across all affected vehicles. If other vehicles received the same software update and the defect persists, there is a significant ongoing safety risk to the public. I am requesting that NHTSA: Investigate whether the Recall 24V589 remedy (EBCM software update) has been effective across all affected vehicles Determine whether a supplemental or revised recall remedy is necessary Require GM/Cadillac to cover physical damages resulting from this post-remedy failure I have also contacted Cadillac Customer Care direct

SERVICE BRAKES,BACK OVER PREVENTION — Filed 03/01/2026

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while reversing, the rear-view safety sensor alert did not function as intended. In addition, the contact stated that the auto-braking safety sensor did not activate. The contact's vehicle crashed into a tree. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired by an independent mechanic or dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and a case was filed. The contact stated that the case was denied. In addition, contact was denied to receive any documents providing the decision of the case. The failure mileage was approximately 18,125.